Ben Fay specializes in local government revenues, advising cities and special districts throughout California in matters concerning local taxes, fees, and assessments, including:
- The California fiscal constitution (Article XIII and Propositions 13, 4, 62, 218, and 26)
- Business license taxes
- Transient occupancy taxes
- Utility user taxes
- Parcel taxes
- Property tax allocation
- Special assessments
- Development impact fees
- Regulatory fees
- Fees for services
- Appropriation limits
- Class actions
Ben also has broad experience defending cities in lawsuits concerning municipal land use and constitutional issues, including free speech, the establishment clause, equal protection, due process, and the separation of powers doctrine.
Ben has prepared numerous amicus curiae briefs for the League of California Cities in cases concerning local government revenues. He is a regular reviewer of the Finance and Economic Development chapter of the California Municipal Law Handbook, and he serves on the League’s Proposition 26 Implementation Guide Committee.
From 2003 to 2005, he chaired the City of Oakland’s Budget Advisory Committee, and in 2003 he served on the City of Oakland’s Charter Review Committee.
Every year since 2008, Ben has been selected by Law & Politics for inclusion in its list of “Super Lawyers” in Northern California which seeks to list the top five percent of lawyers in Northern California through a process of independent evaluation and peer review.
Ben received a B.A. in anthropology from UC Berkeley in 1991 and a J.D. from UC Hastings College of the Law in 1995.
Published decisions in which Ben played a lead role include:
- Russell City Energy Center Company, LLC v. City of Hayward (2017) 14 Cal.App.5th 54 [Utility user tax and Art. XIII, §31 of the California Consititution]
- City and County of San Francisco v. Regents of the University of California et al. (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 1107 [Parking tax and sovereign immunity] [Under review by the California Supreme Court]
- Sipple v. City of Hayward (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 349 [utility user tax]
- City of Scotts Valley v. County of Santa Cruz (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 1 [property tax allocation]
- Rental Housing Owners Assn. of Southern Alameda County, Inc. v. City of Hayward (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 81 [rental housing inspection and the fourth amendment]
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Turlock (E.D. Cal. 2006) 483 F.Supp.2d 987 [zoning and equal protection]
- Traders Sports, Inc. v. City of San Leandro (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 37 [Proposition 62 and business license tax]
Published decisions in which Ben prepared an amicus brief for the League of California Cities include:
- Citizens for Fair REU Rates v. City of Redding (2015) 233 Cal.App. 4th 402 [Proposition 26 and municipal electric rates] [Under review by the California Supreme Court]
- City of Alhambra v. County of Los Angeles (2013) 55 Cal.4th 707 [property tax administration fees]
- City of Clovis v. County of Fresno (2013) 22 Cal.App.4th 1469 [property tax administration fees]
- Citizens Association of Sunset Beach v. Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission(2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 1182 [Proposition 218 and annexations]
- City of Dinuba v. County of Tulare (2007) 41 Cal.4th 859 [property tax allocation]
- AB Cellular v. City of Los Angeles (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 747 [Proposition 218 and telephone utility user tax]
Ben’s Presentations and Papers:
- “Utility Users Tax: Changes, Challenges, and Solutions,” California Municipal Revenue and Taxation Association, Annual Conference, 2017.
- “The Demographic Effects of Proposition 13 and other Unintended Consequences,” Municipal Finance Institute, December 3, 2014.
- “Business License Tax on Internet Companies; Transient Occupancy Tax from Online Hotel Brokers and VRBO-type Web-Based Rentals,” League of California Cities, City Attorneys’ Spring Conference, May 8, 2014.
- “Are You Receiving All of Your Property Taxes?” Western City Magazine, January 2007.
- “Regulating Discount Superstores: Ordinances Restricting Big Box Retailers with Grocery Departments,” League of California Cities, Annual Conference, September 17, 2004.
- “Local Taxation of Cell Phone Companies: Why Cities Must Act Now,” California Municipal Revenue and Taxation Association, Division III, Quarterly Meeting, March 13, 2003.
- “Local Taxation of Cell Phone Companies,” Public Law Education Series, November 21, 2002.
- “Municipal Revenues: Practical Insights into Ways to Protect and Enhance Municipal Revenues,” Public Law Education Series, September 26, 2002.
- “Nexus: Do You Have the Legal Authority to Tax,” California Municipal Revenue and Taxation Association, Annual Conference, 2002.
- “The Essential Role of Foreclosure in the Maintenance of Special Assessment Districts,Public Law Journal, Winter 2000.